Skip to content
What’s blocking the future of invisible payments and why?

What’s blocking the future of invisible payments and why?

Invisible payments have already had a massive impact on the physical and online retail experience, and could have the potential to eradicate cash and payment cards from the payment journey. Amazon Go even went as far as removing POS systems from its payment processes to provide consumers with, what they consider to be, an enhanced in-store experience.

invisible payments

What’s blocking the future of invisible payments and why?

Consumers have demanded frictionless checkout experiences. Whether they are getting a sandwich at the neighbourhood cafe or buying trousers they saw on Instagram, consumers expect to complete purchases almost with the wave of a magic wand.

Online stores are making strides to make checkout experiences as frictionless as possible – which makes sense, considering that UK e-commerce sites suffer from cart abandonment rates of 76% – implementing one-click checkouts using PayPal and other alternative payment methods such as Apple Pay.

While the impact of invisible payments is expected to be significant – predictions are they will account for $78 billion in annual transactions by 2022 – there are some indications that the road there is going to be bumpy for the UK. Not all consumers have been enthusiastic about invisible payments. In addition to customer demand for invisible payments, the diversity of products, prices, and consumer payment preferences both locally and internationally make it quite complicated on the back-end.

For invisible payments to gain mass consumer adoption, there are several cultural and logistical barriers that retailers and the payment industry must consider first.

Consumers want to authenticate big-ticket purchases

Implementing invisible payments for high-value transactions will be a significant barrier. There are many, many successful use cases for low-value invisible transactions; Uber was adopted so widely and so rapidly thanks, in large part, to the user’s payment experience. All these ridesharing companies mostly handle relatively low-value transactions, with consumers welcoming the convenience of this frictionless payment process.

But what happens when the transaction is over £100?

Buying something for £100 or more without authentication is an uncomfortable thought for many consumers. It can be argued that customers expect – indeed want – a level of friction when making certain purchases. Businesses with big-ticket items will still need to provide consumers with an option to use more traditional payment journeys for the foreseeable future.

Cash-dependent and underbanked shoppers

Despite a seemingly ubiquitous shift to digital payment methods, cash is not disappearing anytime soon. Consumers in many booming e-commerce markets still have a strong preference for or reliance upon cash-based payment methods; Mexico, Brazil, and Japan are a few examples. In the UK, some demographics prefer to use and rely on cash, particularly the elderly and underbanked. It is estimated that despite the introduction of new technology and different payment methods, cash will still account for nearly 10% of UK transactions in 2028.

Retailers can’t afford to miss out on sales from such a large number of consumers, so they need to take care to introduce invisible payments gradually and, where possible, give consumers options. If they don’t, they run the risk of losing business to the competition.

Regulatory requirements 

Recent regulations have correlated with consumers becoming increasingly aware of the need to protect their data and monitor for fraud. Strong Customer Authentication (SCA), enforced under the second Payment Services Directive (PSD2), states that a customer must verify their identity before payment information can be exchanged between a financial institution and a third-party provider (TPP). Put in place to prevent fraudulent transactions, it simply means that SCA requires consumers to authenticate payments by entering a PIN or using biometric data like a thumbprint. While transaction value will likely influence the level of authentication required under SCA, the need for authentication is an inherent barrier to a frictionless or invisible payment. It remains to be seen how invisible payments and SCA will coexist.

A proliferation of locally preferred payment methods

As commerce goes global, payment preferences – using cards, e-wallets, cash, etcetera – are becoming more and more local. That can be a surprise for people in the UK and US; PPRO’s recent research[1] highlights that 91% of UK consumers use debit and credit card payments. But there are over 450 significant local payment methods (LPMs) across the globe, accounting for over 75% of global e-commerce transactions.

In the UK, PayPal is the most widely used method for invisible payments. However, the Dutch opt for iDEAL as their payment method of choice, which is less suited to invisible payments. In Latin American markets, cash-based payment methods like Boleto Bancário in Brazil and OXXO in Mexico take up a significant share of e-commerce. Those are certainly not invisible either, as the customer has to visit a brick-and-mortar store to pay. If customers are forced to use a payment method they don’t trust, over 65%2 are likely to go to another retailer that accepts their preferred payment method. For UK-based retailers who want to do business across borders, it’s important to recognise that the key to increasing conversion is accepting your customer’s preferred payment method.

Unsuccessful implementation of invisible payments – where locally preferred payment methods are overlooked – could lead to the loss of loyal customers to a competitor. But with so many LPMs, it’s extremely difficult to establish a single unifying, invisible payment journey to achieve global adoption.

So, what does the future hold for invisible payments?

There is no doubt: invisible payments will continue to revolutionise the customer experience for casual or everyday purchases. However, it’s my opinion that we won’t see invisible payment journeys across the board for quite a while; consumer trust, cash-dependent shoppers, regulatory requirements, and the explosion of local payment methods are significant hurdles that have to be jumped in order for that to happen.

However, it’s our goal at PPRO to help payment service providers and retailers create the best customer experiences possible, gain brand loyalty and increase conversion in every market. Invisible payments surely have their part to play in that, so here’s what I recommend for getting on the road to success: Get to know your customer. Learn how they like to pay for each purchase they make. Offer the right payment methods. Don’t force adoption of invisible payments, but incentivise it through exclusive discounts or bonus loyalty points. This all boils down to providing the customer with options because, ultimately, we live in a society that expects choice.

Retailers that provide customers with their preferred way to pay – visible or invisible – will be the ones who prosper in today’s competitive marketplace.

 

[1] PPRO research, conducted by Arlington Research February 2020. Sample: 1,000 UK consumers, nationally representative of adults aged 18+ based on gender and age.

2 PPRO research, conducted by Arlington Research August 2018. Sample: 1,000 UK consumers, nationally representative of adults aged 18+ based on gender and age.

 

The post What’s blocking the future of invisible payments and why? appeared first on Payments Cards & Mobile.

Cart 0

Your cart is currently empty.

Start Shopping